Dr Sufian Abu Zaida, członek Fatahu bliski Muhammada Dahlana i były minister ds. więźniów w Autonomii Palestyńskiej (AP) znany jest z częstej krytyki prezydenta AP, Mahmouda 'Abbasa i w przeszłości był nawet z tego powodu zawieszony jako członek Fatahu. W artykule z16 sierpnia 2020 na witrynie internetowej Samanews.ps, ostro skrytykował palestyńską reakcję na porozumienie o normalizacji stosunków między Izraelem a ZEA, która przyjęła postać przekleństw, oskarżeń o zdradę wobec ZEA i palenie Flagi Emiratów oraz portretów przywódców ZEA. Abu Zaida wezwał Palestyńczyków do zrozumienia, że nie są dłużej “centrum wszechświata” i że ich sprawa nie jest już na szczytach porządków dnia w krajach arabskich ani w innych krajach na świecie, które są obecnie zajęte własnymi interesami, walkami i kłopotami. Spadek status sprawy palestyńskiej, powiedział, wynika z trwającego rozłamu między Palestyńczykami i z ich nieumiejętności założenia państwowych instytucji, które odznaczałyby się prawością, przejrzystością i rozdziałem władzy, jak również uczciwym i solidnym sądownictwem. Wezwał dlatego Palestyńczyków do przeanalizowania własnego zachowania w ostatnich dziesięcioleciach, żeby zrozumieć, co zrobili dobrze, a co zrobili źle.
Abu Zaida oskarżył także AP o hipokryzję, notując, że potępia ZEA za normalizowanie stosunków z Izraelem, ale nigdy nie potępiła Kataru za jego wieloletnie związki z Izraelem. Ponadto, AP współpracowała z arabskimi politykami, którzy utrzymywali stosunki z Izraelem, kiedy pasowało to do jej celów. Abu Zaida skierował podobną krytykę wobec Turcji, która utrzymuje rozległe stosunki handlowe i dotyczące bezpieczeństwa z Izraelem, niemniej ostro zjeżdża porozumienie między Izraelem a ZEA. Zakończył stwierdzeniem, że jeśli Palestyńczycy uważają to porozumienie za katastrofę, to powinni przygotować się na dodatkowe katastrofy tego rodzaju. Poradził im, by – jeśli chcą przywrócić prestiż swojej sprawie i osiągnąć swoje cele – ponownie oszacowali swoją drogę, zjednoczyli szeregi, przeprowadzili wybory i zreformowali swoje instytucje i sądownictwo.
Dr Sufian Abu Zaida (Źródło: Samanews.ps)
Poniżej znajdują się fragmenty artykułu Abu Zaidy:[1]
[Dalszy tekst nie jest spolszczony]
„The tripartite Israeli-American-Emirati agreement that was announced the day before yesterday [August 13, 2020] in three capitals is a kind of political earthquake in the region that will have many repercussions. As a Palestinian, I regard the PLO as the sole legitimate representative of the Palestinian people authorized to speak in their name, and I respect the decisions and agreements made by its institutions. [I also believe that] for any Arab country to normalize relations with Israel before the attainment of a just peace [between Israel and the Palestinians] based on the two-state solution and the establishment of a Palestinian state on the June 4, 1967 borders is undesirable and does not serve the Palestinian interest.
„That said, it is time for us Palestinians to realize that times have changed and no longer follow the Palestinian clock, and that countries look out for their own interests and only then consider the interests of others. It is time for us Palestinians to realize that we are no longer the center of the universe and that the Palestinian cause, important and sacred though it is, is no longer the foremost cause of the other Arab countries, [for] there are conflicts, struggles and disasters that the world considers more important than the Palestinian cause.
„We must look in the mirror and see the truth as it is, not as each of us wants to see it. The culture of curses, invective, accusations of treason, and burning of pictures and flags does not yield [a coherent] policy, protect us from danger or solve any problem. Most importantly, it does not exempt us from examining our conduct over the decades: what we did right, what we did wrong and what [harm] we have done to ourselves. Does anyone dispute the fact that the Palestinian cause has lost much of its sanctity and prestige in the eyes of the peoples and countries, especially the Arab countries? It has lost its sanctity and prestige first of all due to objective reasons stemming from regional and global changes which are beyond our control. But this [decline] is also due to the internal [Palestinian] schism, the fighting among us and our preoccupation with our internal disputes… for over four decades.
„The Palestinian cause has lost its prestige because we have failed to create state institutions based on integrity, transparency and the separation of powers, so that the law would apply to officials and leaders even before it applied to the common folk. A quarter of a century after the establishment of the [Palestinian] Authority and 14 years after the split [between Gaza and the West Bank], we have a distorted creature that is neither an authority, a state nor a revolution.
„Whoever follows the official Palestinian response to the tripartite [Israeli-American-Emirati] agreement and the ruthless attack on the UAE senses that it is not just a matter of opposing the agreement and regarding it as a knife in the [Palestinians’] back, but also a matter of score-settling that goes beyond the agreement — unless there is 'legitimate’ normalization and 'forbidden’ normalization, or 'sacred’ normalization and 'unholy’ normalization.
„How can the Palestinian citizen interpret the silence of the Palestinian leadership over Qatar’s normalization [of relations] with Israel since 1996 and the open establishment of an [Israeli] representation there… which provoked no criticism? And how can the Palestinian citizen interpret the PA’s failure to criticize Qatar for the suitcases of dollars that [the Qatari envoy Muhammad] Al-’Amadi brings into Gaza through the Tel Aviv airport — which, according to [the PA], deepens the schism among the Palestinians and between Gaza and the West Bank? Why do we not hear a single Palestinian leader denounce this? Does this [silence] not raise questions?
„I do not mean to criticize or attack Qatar. It [too] is a country with it own allies, policy and interests, and it acts according to these interests. It adopts the same ideology as the Muslim Brotherhood [MB] in the region and acts to establish it. I just wish to point out that some people remain silent over Qatar’s 'permitted’ normalization with Israel, but give free rein to [all those who] criticize, attack and brutally curse the [UAE’s] 'forbidden’ normalization [with Israel].
„I understand the stance of our brothers in Hamas. They do not criticize Qatar or its normalization [with Israel], first of all because Qatar adopts the ideology of the MB and Caliph Erdogan, and second, because most [of the members] of Hamas’s political bureau live in Qatar. But I cannot understand Hamas’s position when it comes to making a distinction between different cases of normalization.
„The same goes for Caliph Erdogan, who joined the bandwagon and used the agreement to settle scores with his rivals [in the UAE], with whom he has clashed on multiple fronts and whom he sees as an obstacle to the implementation of the MB ideology. Is it not ridiculous that Erdogan talks [against] normalization, when Turkey and Israel have [joint] economic interests, [Turkey’s] trade [with Israel] amounts to $5 billion a year, Israeli pilots train in [Turkey’s] skies and Israel provides [Turkey] with spare parts for its U.S.-manufactured planes, as well as drone technology?…
„[Here is] another case of normalization which [appears to be] welcome and sacred in the eyes of those who remain silent whenever [denouncing normalization] contravenes their personal interests: Two years ago, Netanyahu visited Oman and met with its late sultan, Qaboos [bin Sa’id Al-Sa’id]. There was no Palestinian response [to this visit]. In fact, some even tied it to the visit of [PA] President [Mahmoud] 'Abbas in Oman only two days before Netanyahu’s visit.
„The last example of 'sacred’ normalization is the visit of Anwar 'Eshki, a [former] Saudi general and intelligence chief, in Israel. It was not a secret [visit] but an open and recorded one, and [Eshki] was accompanied by a Palestinian official. In other words, this visit, an expression of normalization, not only failed to evoke any rage, but was welcomed by the Palestinians after being categorized as permissible normalization which serves the Palestinian cause, not as the 'knife-in-the-back’ type of normalization.
„In any case, if the tripartite agreement is a disaster as far as the Palestinians are concerned, other disasters are sure to follow, sooner than we think. So save yourselves some effort and curses… and prepare the pictures of presidents, leaders and prominent figures of [certain] states [in advance] – because, sad and painful though it may be, we will again find ourselves standing alone, facing the danger of a decline [in the status] of our cause.
„The path to [achieving] liberation, freedom and an [independent] state, regaining our rights, and restoring the status of the honorable Palestinian cause, so that it once again tops the agenda of our [Arab] brothers and [our other] allies, will only be found when we Palestinians decide to reexamine and reassess our conduct and distorted [perceptions], unite our ranks and end the schism among us, resume the rebuilding of our institutions, hold elections and separate our powers, respect our laws and the decisions of our judiciary and agree on our national plan. Only then will we have a chance to restore our cause to the status it deserves.”
[1] Samanews.ps, August 16, 2020.
