{"id":9978,"date":"2017-11-14T19:38:23","date_gmt":"2017-11-14T18:38:23","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www2.memri.org\/polish\/?p=9978"},"modified":"2017-11-14T19:38:23","modified_gmt":"2017-11-14T18:38:23","slug":"rezim-syryjski-i-jego-sojusznicy-al-rakka-jest-okupowana-przez-sojusznikow-usa-wygnamy-usa-z-syrii-takze-srodkami-militarnymi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www2.memri.org\/polish\/rezim-syryjski-i-jego-sojusznicy-al-rakka-jest-okupowana-przez-sojusznikow-usa-wygnamy-usa-z-syrii-takze-srodkami-militarnymi\/9978","title":{"rendered":"Re\u017cim syryjski i jego sojusznicy: Al-Rakka jest okupowana przez sojusznik\u00f3w USA; wygnamy USA z Syrii, tak\u017ce \u015brodkami militarnymi"},"content":{"rendered":"

20 pa\u017adziernika 2017 r., po wyczerpuj\u0105cej, czteromiesi\u0119cznej kampanii militarnej, Syryjskie Si\u0142y Demokratyczne (SDF), wspierane przez USA i sk\u0142adaj\u0105ce si\u0119 g\u0142\u00f3wnie z \u017co\u0142nierzy kurdyjskich, og\u0142osi\u0142y, \u017ce wyzwoli\u0142y Al-Rakk\u0119, g\u0142\u00f3wny bastion Pa\u0144stwa Islamskiego (ISIS) w Syrii. W nast\u0119pstwie tego og\u0142oszenia prezydent USA, Donald Trump powiedzia\u0142, \u017ce \u201epokonanie ISIS w Rakka stanowi prze\u0142om w naszej \u015bwiatowej kampanii pokonania ISIS i jego z\u0142owieszczej ideologii\u201d i doda\u0142, \u017ce wkr\u00f3tce rozpocznie si\u0119 nowy etap, w kt\u00f3rym USA b\u0119d\u0105 \u201cwspiera\u0107 lokalne si\u0142y bezpiecze\u0144stwa, de-eskalowa\u0107 przemoc w ca\u0142ej Syrii i zaprowadza\u0107 warunki trwa\u0142ego pokoju, \u017ceby terrory\u015bci nie mogli powr\u00f3ci\u0107, by raz jeszcze zagrozi\u0107 naszemu wsp\u00f3lnemu bezpiecze\u0144stwu”<\/a>[1]<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n

Ten rozw\u00f3j sytuacji nie jest zgodny z \u017cyczeniami re\u017cimu syryjskiego pod przewodnictwem prezydenta Baszara Al-Assada i jego sojusznika Iranu. Oficjalny rzecznik re\u017cimu powiedzia\u0142, \u017ce miasto znajduje si\u0119 obecnie pod now\u0105 okupacj\u0105, tym razem USA i ich marionetek, i doda\u0142, \u017ce Al-Rakka b\u0119dzie wolna dopiero, kiedy wejdzie tam syryjska armia i nad miastem zawi\u015bnie syryjska flaga. Syria twierdzi\u0142a nawet, \u017ce USA zawar\u0142y umow\u0119 z ISIS, \u017ce opu\u015bci miasto, i wezwa\u0142a do rozwi\u0105zania mi\u0119dzynarodowej koalicji walcz\u0105cej z ISIS, nazywaj\u0105c j\u0105 \u201ew\u0105tpliw\u0105 i nielegaln\u0105\u201d, poniewa\u017c dzia\u0142a bez zgody w\u0142adz syryjskich. <\/em><\/p>\n

Doradca ds. mi\u0119dzynarodowych ira\u0144skiego najwy\u017cszego przyw\u00f3dcy, Alego Chameneiego, Ali Akbar Velajati, grozi\u0142 tak\u017ce konfrontacj\u0105 militarn\u0105 z \u017co\u0142nierzami USA w Syrii, m\u00f3wi\u0105c, \u017ce si\u0142y re\u017cimu syryjskiego i jego sojusznik\u00f3w wkr\u00f3tce rusz\u0105 na wschodni brzeg rzeki Eufrat (w p\u00f3\u0142nocnowschodniej Syrii) w celu wyzwolenia Al-Rakki.<\/em><\/p>\n

Kwestia konfrontacji militarnej z si\u0142ami USA na wypadek, je\u015bli nie wyjd\u0105 z Syrii jako cz\u0119\u015b\u0107 porozumienia, omawiano jeszcze bardziej intensywnie w pa\u0144stwowej prasie syryjskiej. W artyku\u0142ach podkre\u015blano, \u017ce po pokonaniu ISIS nie ma \u017cadnego uzasadnienia obecno\u015bci USA w kraju i \u017ce te si\u0142y musz\u0105 zosta\u0107 wydalone. Ostrzegano, \u017ce je\u015bli te si\u0142y pozostan\u0105, mog\u0105 znale\u017a\u0107 si\u0119 w sytuacji dzia\u0142a\u0144 militarnych, a nawet \u201ezaci\u0119tych bitew\u201d z syryjsk\u0105 armi\u0105 i jej sojusznikami, Iranem i Hezbollahem, a mo\u017ce r\u00f3wnie\u017c z si\u0142ami tureckimi i rosyjskimi.<\/em><\/p>\n

Nale\u017cy wspomnie\u0107, \u017ce z wyj\u0105tkiem Palmiry re\u017cim syryjski i jego sojusznicy unikali na og\u00f3\u0142 atakowania umocnie\u0144 ISIS w Syrii, z kt\u00f3rych wi\u0119kszo\u015b\u0107 znajdowa\u0142a si\u0119 na wschodzie kraju, i wola\u0142y koncentrowa\u0107 swoje wysi\u0142ki na walce z D\u017cabhat Al-Nusra pod jej rozmaitymi nazwami, jak r\u00f3wnie\u017c z si\u0142ami syryjskiej opozycji. Wydaje si\u0119, \u017ce re\u017cim i jego sojusznicy zostawili kampani\u0119 przeciwko ISIS mi\u0119dzynarodowej koalicji pod przewodnictwem USA i si\u0142om miejscowym, kt\u00f3re z ni\u0105 wsp\u00f3\u0142pracuj\u0105, w celu osi\u0105gni\u0119cia dw\u00f3ch cel\u00f3w: unikni\u0119cia wyczerpania swoich si\u0142 w wojnie z ISIS, kt\u00f3re pokaza\u0142o imponuj\u0105c\u0105 wytrwa\u0142o\u015b\u0107, a zamiast tego spowodowania, \u017ce ich rywale z opozycji wyczerpi\u0105 w\u0142asne si\u0142y w walce z t\u0105 organizacj\u0105. Dopiero ostatnio \u2013 po pokonaniu ISIS w Iraku i zmniejszeniu si\u0119 jego si\u0142y w Syrii dzi\u0119ki wysi\u0142kom mi\u0119dzynarodowej koalicji oraz po pokonaniu g\u0142\u00f3wnych bastion\u00f3w opozycji w zachodniej Syrii \u2013 re\u017cim syryjski i jego sojusznicy zwr\u00f3cili swoje starania w kierunku odzyskania \u00a0panowania we wschodniej Syrii. <\/em><\/p>\n

Niniejszy raport stanowi przegl\u0105d reakcji re\u017cimu syryjskiego i jego sojusznik\u00f3w na rozw\u00f3j sytuacji w Al-Rakce [<\/em>ci\u0105g dalszy nie jest spolszczony<\/strong>]:<\/em><\/p>\n

\"\"
Al-Raqqa following the expulsion of ISIS (image: alwatannews.net, October 19, 2017)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Syrian Regime Officials: Al-Raqqa Will Only Be Liberated When The Syrian Army Enters It; The 'Dubious And Illegitimate’ International Coalition Must Be Dismantled <\/strong><\/p>\n

As stated, the Syrian regime did not welcome the SDF’s and the U.S. forces’ presence in Al-Raqqa after the defeat of ISIS. Syrian Information Minister Muhammad Tarjaman conceded that „what happened in Al-Raqqa, [namely] the withdrawal of the ISIS terror organization from it, is a good thing,” but stressed that „the Syrian forces [must] enter the city, no matter who is there now, whether they are called ISIS or anything else… As far as Damascus is concerned, no city is liberated unless the Syrian army has entered it and the Syrian flag has been raised over it. This is true for every geographical region in Syria… Some are trying to hijack the victory in Al-Raqqa by proposing that Saudi Arabia, the U.S., or someone else should rebuild the city or some other place. That is not the wish of the Syrian state.”<\/a>[2]<\/a><\/p>\n

A senior source in the Syrian foreign ministry said, in a similar vein, that „Al-Raqqa was and continues to be an occupied city, and will count as liberated only after the forces of the Syrian regime and its allies, who are fighting the ISIS hordes and their ilk, enter it.” The source added: „The U.S. and its illegitimate coalition continue to deceive the international community regarding their true intentions in Syria. The claim of the U.S. and its allies, that Al-Raqqa has been liberated from ISIS, is nothing but a lie aimed distracting international public opinion from the crimes that this coalition and its apparatuses have committed in Al-Raqqa province… The international community, and those who purport to protect the lives of the innocent and to defend human rights, know that over 90 percent of the city has been buried under the rubble and that all its services and infrastructures have been destroyed… Tens of thousands of the city’s residents have been expelled from the city and from the province villages, and have become refugees in their own land due to the barbaric airstrikes targeting the people of Al-Raqqa and the surrounding villages…<\/p>\n

„The U.S. and its allies celebrated what they called the liberation of Al-Raqqa over the bodies of the victims… Had the U.S. and the so-called SDF not concocted a plot together with ISIS, [this organization] wouldn’t have left the city and moved to other places to fight the Arab Syrian army, the Iraqi army and Al-Hashd Al-Sha’bi [the Popular Mobilization Forces, PMU]… The fact that the U.S. and its coalition rushed to call for the rebuilding of Al-Raqqa was nothing but [an attempt to] deceive international public opinion, so as to conceal the destruction that they and their proxies have caused in the city… Syria calls to dismantle this dubious and illegitimate coalition, because anyone claiming to fight ISIS must be legitimate and act with the consent of the Syrian state and within the framework of the UN Charter and the resolutions of the UN Security Council regarding the war on terror.”<\/a>[3]<\/a><\/p>\n

Advisor To Iranian Supreme Leader Khamenei: Syrian Forces Will Advance Towards Al-Raqqa<\/strong><\/p>\n

During a recent visit to Lebanon, Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei’s advisor for international affairs, Ali Akbar Velayati, also threatened a Syrian military move to retake Al-Raqqa: „The Americans, by means of their support for the Zionists, and the Zionists themselves, have always tried to break and destroy the resistance. They have heavily pressured Syria because it is the main ally of the resistance. By situating themselves east of the Euphrates, they are acting to split Syria in two. Just as they did not and will not succeed in Iraq, they will not succeed in Syria either. Very soon, we will see the government and popular forces in Syria advance towards the eastern [bank of the] Euphrates and liberate the city of Al-Raqqa.”<\/a>[4]<\/a><\/p>\n

Articles In Syrian Press: We Will Not Allow A U.S. Presence In Syria \u2013 It Must Be Uprooted, Even By Military Means<\/strong><\/p>\n

Calls for the U.S. forces to withdraw from Syria have been presented forcefully in articles in the Syrian government and regime-affiliated press. These articles have stated that once ISIS is defeated, there is no longer be any justification for U.S. and Turkish forces to remain in Syria, and that their presence there was illegitimate from the outset. Therefore, they said, the Syrian state is authorized to expel them from the country, even by military means. A similar tone was taken with regard to the SDF, which participated in the fighting to defeat ISIS in Al-Raqqa; it was referred to as „the other face of ISIS” that serves the U.S. and is working to divide Syria.<\/p>\n

Al-Thawra<\/em><\/strong> Columnist: The U.S. Clash with All Pro-Syria Forces On Syrian Soil Could Lead To Global Conflict <\/strong><\/p>\n

In a column in the government daily Al-Thawra<\/em>, titled „Expelling the American Presence,” Munir Al-Moussa called for uprooting the entire American presence in Syria, even by means of resistance: „Our victories in Syria and Iraq had a positive impact on the region, but the American presence is still here, in order to spread chaos, to support and feed the Zionist, Ottoman, and Wahhabi aspirations, and to attempt to establish a territorial presence in Idlib<\/a>[5]<\/a> and Al-Raqqa. If the presence of the occupiers is not uprooted by all possible diplomatic means, [or] even by resistance, they will thwart the solution in Syria…<\/p>\n

„After the defeat of ISIS, which 'justified’ [American involvement in Syria], there is nothing for these forces to do but pack their gear and depart, whether they want to or not, because their presence is illegitimate. Once the pretext of [fighting] ISIS is gone, the U.S. could clash with all Syria’s allies on Syrian soil, which could lead to global conflict…”<\/a>[6]<\/a><\/p>\n

\"\"
Al-Moussa’s column in Al-Thawra: „Expelling the American Presence”<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Al-Watan<\/em><\/strong> Columnist: If There Is An Armed Conflict, The American Units May Be Surrounded And Immobilized <\/strong><\/p>\n

Tahsin Al-Halabi, columnist for the Syrian regime-affiliated Al-Watan, <\/em>called the presence of the American and Turkish forces in northern Syria „illegitimate” and warned that Syria would not allow these forces to remain after the defeat of ISIS: „After the elimination of all ISIS groups in this geographical region [i.e. northeast Syria] there will be a need to bring about a withdrawal of all the military units whose presence will no longer be legitimate \u2013 whether they are Turkish, American, or Kurdish units. By virtue of its sovereignty over Syrian soil, the Syrian leadership has the authority to force this withdrawal on all these units… The Trump administration knows well that these American military units deployed [in Syria] in order to support the Syrian Kurds will find it difficult to operate among the forces that are hostile to them, for example, the Syrian army and its allies from Iran and Hizbullah, and also forces such as Turkey, which opposes [U.S.] support for the Syrian Kurds for its own reasons. If there is any armed conflict whatsoever with these American units in this region, they will not be safe, because the threat that they constitute to all these elements, including the Russian units, will prompt [these elements] to close in on the [Americans] and restrict their ability to maneuver… Syria and its allies, who are vanquishing ISIS, will in no way agree to a ceasefire with these American units, nor will they allow them to remain in any way, shape, or form…”<\/a>[7]<\/a><\/p>\n

Another Al-Watan <\/em>Columnist: Washington Has Two Options \u2013 Withdrawal Or Maintaining A Risky Military Presence <\/strong><\/p>\n

Muhammad 'Abid, another Al-Watan <\/em>columnist, wrote: „After the lifting of [ISIS’s] siege on the city of Deir Al-Zor, and after then liberating the region between it and the Al-Bukamal region and up to the Iraqi border, we will be able to discern the achievement [of the Syrian regime] on the ground and in the political sphere in all things concerning the occupation of Syrian land by the American forces, [an occupation that is maintained] either directly or by means of the so-called SDF. This achievement will be an inevitable part of the process of the military campaign being waged by the Syrian army and its allies in order to put an end to the presence of the military groups that are not fighting alongside this army. This is in accordance with the determined decision by the Syrian leadership that the transfer of control of Al-Raqqa from ISIS to the SDF, for example, does not mean liberation and restoring it to the bosom of the homeland. How is it possible to think this, when the patron of this dubious process of transferring control is the American occupation?!<\/p>\n

„This is a call of defiance that will expose the extent of the ability of the American occupation forces to remain in an environment that opposes their presence. Washington will face a difficult decision: withdrawal in the framework of understandings with the Russian rival, or maintaining a continued presence rife with danger; right now it does not seem that the Trump administration is willing to face [this danger].<\/p>\n

„The closer we get to the gates of Al-Raqqa and Idlib, the closer we get to the beginning of the end of the program of aggression against Syria. Then there will be several main options: fierce military battles that will restore Syria’s absolute sovereignty over her land, borders, and natural resources, or gradual political solutions that will remove the two occupiers [the U.S. and Turkey], eliminate the elements that are collaborating with them, and establish [Syrian] sovereignty.”<\/a>[8]<\/a><\/p>\n

Al-Thawra <\/em><\/strong>Columnist: Liberating Al-Raqqa And Idlib Will Open The Way From Iran To Iraq And Syria <\/strong><\/p>\n

Several articles clarified Al-Raqqa’s importance for the Syrian regime and its allies. Hussein Saqr, columnist for Al-Thawra, <\/em>wrote: „Today, now that Al-Bukamal has been purged of the pollution of terrorism, and both banks of the Euphrates have been freed from the talons of terrorism, Idlib and Al-Raqqa are preparing for victory and liberation, so that all the paths from Iran to Iraq and Syria will be open.”<\/a>[9]<\/a><\/p>\n

'Abd Al-Halim Sa’ud, another columnist, wrote that after the developments in Al-Bukamal „that stripped from the hands of the American coalition one of the strongest and most dangerous cards in [its] filthy game… [the Syrian regime and its allies] decided to begin preparations for a discussion on the fate of the Al-Raqqa stronghold, after it was emptied of ISIS in the framework of a deal between America [and ISIS]… and handed over to the other face of ISIS, the so-called SDF, in order to mislead and throw sand in the eyes [of the world]. No one disagrees that one of the most vexing nightmares for the destructive American plan in Syria is what happened in recent months in Deir Al-Zor province, and in other areas, and what could happen in Al-Raqqa province \u2013 which is again top priority for Damascus and its allies, in order to block every aspiration for secession on the part of the agents in the SDF militia who have placed themselves at the service of the destructive, aggressive American plan…”<\/a>[10]<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

<\/a>[1]<\/a> Reuters.com, October 21, 2017.<\/p>\n

<\/a>[2]<\/a> Al-Watan<\/em> (Syria), October 24, 2017.<\/p>\n

<\/a>[3]<\/a> SANA (Syria), October 29, 2017.<\/p>\n

<\/a>[4]<\/a> Al-Mustaqbal <\/em>(Lebanon), November 4, 2017.<\/p>\n

<\/a>[5]<\/a> The city of Idlib, in western Syria, is the last major stronghold of the Syrian opposition, and is included in the interim de-escalation zone agreements arrived at under Russia’s aegis.<\/p>\n

<\/a>[6]<\/a> Al-Thawra <\/em>(Syria), November 12, 2017.<\/p>\n

<\/a>[7]<\/a> Al-Watan <\/em>(Syria) October 29, 2017.<\/p>\n

<\/a>[8]<\/a> Al-Watan <\/em>(Syria), November 2, 2017.<\/p>\n

<\/a>[9]<\/a> Al-Thawra <\/em>(Syria), November 10, 2017.<\/p>\n

<\/a>[10]<\/a> Al-Thawra <\/em>(Syria), November 10, 2017.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

20 pa\u017adziernika 2017 r., po wyczerpuj\u0105cej, czteromiesi\u0119cznej kampanii militarnej, Syryjskie Si\u0142y Demokratyczne (SDF), wspierane przez USA i sk\u0142adaj\u0105ce si\u0119 g\u0142\u00f3wnie z \u017co\u0142nierzy kurdyjskich, og\u0142osi\u0142y, \u017ce wyzwoli\u0142y Al-Rakk\u0119, g\u0142\u00f3wny bastion Pa\u0144stwa Islamskiego (ISIS) w Syrii. W nast\u0119pstwie tego og\u0142oszenia prezydent USA, Donald Trump powiedzia\u0142, \u017ce \u201epokonanie ISIS w Rakka stanowi prze\u0142om w naszej \u015bwiatowej kampanii pokonania […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":9979,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[824,829,830,835,836,837],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-9978","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-specjalne-komunikaty","category-usa-i-bliski-wschod","category-syria","category-archiwum","category-tematy","category-kraje"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www2.memri.org\/polish\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9978","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www2.memri.org\/polish\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www2.memri.org\/polish\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www2.memri.org\/polish\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www2.memri.org\/polish\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9978"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www2.memri.org\/polish\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9978\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9981,"href":"https:\/\/www2.memri.org\/polish\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9978\/revisions\/9981"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www2.memri.org\/polish\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9979"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www2.memri.org\/polish\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9978"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www2.memri.org\/polish\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9978"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www2.memri.org\/polish\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9978"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}