{"id":8388,"date":"2017-02-14T23:06:10","date_gmt":"2017-02-14T22:06:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www2.memri.org\/polish\/?p=8388"},"modified":"2017-02-14T23:07:53","modified_gmt":"2017-02-14T22:07:53","slug":"gazeta-libanska-al-akhbar-atakuje-specjalna-koordynator-onz-w-libanie-za-sprzeciw-wobec-uzbrojenia-hezbollahu","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www2.memri.org\/polish\/gazeta-libanska-al-akhbar-atakuje-specjalna-koordynator-onz-w-libanie-za-sprzeciw-wobec-uzbrojenia-hezbollahu\/8388","title":{"rendered":"Gazeta liba\u0144ska \u201cAl-Akhbar\u201d atakuje specjaln\u0105 koordynator ONZ w Libanie za sprzeciw wobec uzbrojenia Hezbollahu"},"content":{"rendered":"

11 lutego 2017 r. w wywiadzie dla egipskiego kana\u0142u telewizyjnego CBC prezydent liba\u0144ski Michel 'Aoun usprawiedliwia\u0142 posiadanie broni przez Hezbollah: \u201cJak d\u0142ugo jest ziemia [liba\u0144ska] okupowana przez Izrael i jak d\u0142ugo armia [liba\u0144ska] nie jest wystarczaj\u0105co silna, by walczy\u0107 z Izraelem, uwa\u017camy, \u017ce bro\u0144 [ruchu oporu] jest niezb\u0119dna dla uzupe\u0142nienia broni armii\u201d. Doda\u0142: \u201cBro\u0144 Hezbollahu absolutnie nie stawia wyzwania pa\u0144stwu i jest g\u0142\u00f3wn\u0105 cz\u0119\u015bci\u0105 obrony Libanu”<\/a>[1]<\/strong><\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n

Wypowied\u017a 'Aouna wywo\u0142a\u0142a krytyk\u0119 Specjalnej Koordynator ONZ dla Libanu, Sigrid Kaag, kt\u00f3ra tweetowa\u0142a: „Przypominam Rezolucj\u0119 1701 podstawow\u0105 dla stabilno\u015bci bezpiecze\u0144stwa Libanu. Rezolucja, kt\u00f3ra wzywa do rozbrojenia wszystkich grup zbrojnych. \u017badnej broni poza kontrol\u0105 pa\u0144stwa”<\/a>[2]<\/strong><\/a>. Kaag powiedzia\u0142a p\u00f3\u017aniej gazecie liba\u0144skiej \u201cAl-Nahar\u201d, \u017ce s\u0142owa \u00a0'Aoun s\u0105 niepokoj\u0105ce i \u017ce zamierza spotka\u0107 si\u0119 z nim, by om\u00f3wi\u0107 t\u0119 spraw\u0119<\/a>[3]<\/strong><\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Tweet Sigrid Kaag z 13 lutego<\/strong><\/p>\n

Nast\u0119pnego dnia, 14 lutego 2017 r., Hassan 'Aliq, publicysta gazety liba\u0144skiej \u201cAl-Akhbar\u201d, kt\u00f3ry jest znany z popierania Hezbollahu napisa\u0142 artyku\u0142 zatytu\u0142owany <\/em>Sigrid Kaag, zamknij si\u0119!, w kt\u00f3rym ostro zaatakowa\u0142 Kaag za jej sprzeciw wobec uzbrojenia Hezbollahu. \u017b\u0105da\u0142 w nim, by \u201ezamkn\u0119\u0142a si\u0119\u201d i powiedzia\u0142 jej, by \u201eumar\u0142a z w\u015bciek\u0142o\u015bci\u201d. Twierdzi\u0142, \u017ce Kaag, podobnie jak inni dyplomaci zachodni w Libanie, jest niezadowolona, \u017ce na czele re\u017cimu liba\u0144skiego stoi pot\u0119\u017cna posta\u0107, tak jak \u2018Aoun, kt\u00f3ry odmawia k\u0142aniania si\u0119 im i m\u00f3wi szczerze. Hezbollah, napisa\u0142, sta\u0142 si\u0119 \u201eolbrzymi\u0105 si\u0142\u0105 regionaln\u0105\u201d, kt\u00f3ra ro\u015bnie codziennie w si\u0142\u0119, gromadzi bro\u0144, posiada zmieniaj\u0105c\u0105 sytuacj\u0119 si\u0142\u0119, dzia\u0142a na po\u0142udnie od rzeki Litani i ignoruje istnienie Rezolucji 1701 Rady Bezpiecze\u0144stwa. Doda\u0142, \u017ce nar\u00f3d liba\u0144ski popiera wzrastaj\u0105ca si\u0142\u0119 Hezbollahu i \u201eb\u0119dzie niezadowolony z [ruchu] oporu, je\u015bli zdob\u0119dzie co\u015b mniej ni\u017c bomb\u0119 j\u0105drow\u0105\u201d.<\/em><\/p>\n

Poni\u017cej podajemy [niespolszczone<\/strong>] fragmenty tego artku\u0142u<\/a>[4]<\/strong><\/a><\/em><\/p>\n

„Lebanon is attractive to consuls. It is home to an army of politicians, people who yearn to be ministers or MPs, businessmen, clerics, members of the media, key figures in society, intellectuals, and the like \u2013 who worship the [foreign] consuls and draw strength solely from [serving foreign] embassies [in Lebanon]. Nothing is valid for them unless it is issued by [some] superpower. They say that the former French ambassador to Beirut, Barnard \u00c9mi\u00e9, sunk into a deep depression after his [recall from Lebanon] and his reappointment as his country’s ambassador to Turkey. [This is because] in Beirut, \u00c9mi\u00e9 partnered with [former U.S. ambassador to Lebanon] Jeffrey Feltman in order to 'engineer’ the regime in Beirut [to operate according to their will] after the Syrian withdrawal from Lebanon. He was guest of honor at countless meetings and banquets. No one contradicted him. He was above the [Lebanese] constitution, and his influence was greater than that of the law. The difference between him and any high commissioner who ruled Lebanon before 1943 is merely in their official duties. Conversely, in Turkey, he is strictly an ambassador who represents the interests of his country, without servants, without motorcades, and without the applause that accompanied his arrival at meetings. He receives no gifts, is not invited [to events], and there are no politicians willing to do anything just to receive a recommendation from 'his eminence’ to include their name on the list of people who will receive some order of merit from the \u00c9lys\u00e9e Palace.<\/p>\n

„The weight of the American ambassador to Beirut is several times that of the French ambassador. He is a god to many politicians. Additionally, the British ambassador and the EU representative are treated, at the very least, like prophets. In recent years, the list of people worshipped [in Lebanon] also saw the addition of the UN Special Coordinator [for Lebanon]. This same UN, which is powerless to do anything in the world, has a high commissioner in Lebanon who runs from the home of one [Lebanese] politician to another, from this ministry to that administration, and from one association to the next, without being stopped by anyone… Because this is Lebanon, the UN Special Coordinator becomes a high commissioner in the fullest sense of the term. Sigrid Kaag currently serves in this role. The comments by President Michel 'Aoun two days ago [February 11, 2017] regarding the role of the resistance [i.e. Hizbullah] in Lebanon angered [Kaag], who reminded us of [UN Security Council] Resolution 1701 and of the regular empty talk of 'disarming all armed groups.’<\/p>\n

„This lady, who does not address any Israeli violation of Lebanese sovereignty or the occupation of the Jaroud 'Arsal area by ISIS, and who operates as a very low-level clerk in the American administration, who opposes strengthening the Lebanese army, told the website [for the Lebanese daily] Al-Nahar<\/em> yesterday [February 13] that 'Aoun’s comments were 'concerning.’ She later denied to [Lebanese news channel] LBCI that she had commented on 'Aoun’s remarks.<\/p>\n

„We must say the truth: 'Aoun’s remarks are indeed concerning [to them]. For the first time in 10 years, the international community encounters a Lebanese official at this level, who speaks candidly…<\/p>\n

„But in fairness, we must thank Kaag for her courage. Yesterday she took it on herself to speak for her American, British, French, and European colleagues, who are displeased with 'Aoun and his positions, and who oppose anything that includes even a possibility of constructing a strong state in Lebanon. This is because it is better for them [if Lebanon] remains a submissive [private] estate that requires their protection, and nothing more.<\/p>\n

„Ms. Kaag, thank you for your courage, but die in your rage. The Lebanese resistance has become a massive regional force. Its capabilities increase daily in terms of armament, equipment, and manpower, as well as in terms of the game-changing weapons [it possesses], both north and south of the Litani [River]. As for Resolution 1701 \u2013 it is the last thing on our minds. In fact, one might assume that the resistance members who dig the underground missile silos have forgotten that [Resolution 1701] even exists, or haven’t even bothered hearing about it in the first place. The only thing on their minds, as the defenders of our country’s security, is to increase the might of our resistance. Many Lebanese will be displeased with the resistance if it attains anything less than a nuclear bomb.<\/p>\n

„Ms. Kaag, this country is completely different than what you think. There are people here who believe it is an independent and sovereign nation, including the man at the head of the regime \u2013 Michel 'Aoun.<\/p>\n

„Ms. Kaag, speak nicely or shut up.”<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

<\/a>[1]<\/a> Al-Mustaqbal<\/em> (Lebanon), February 12, 2017.<\/a>
\n[2]<\/a> Twitter.com\/SigridKaag, February 13, 2017.<\/a>
\n[3]<\/a> Al-Nahar<\/em> (Lebanon), February 13, 2017.<\/a>
\n[4]<\/a> Al-Akhbar<\/em> (Lebanon), February 14, 2017.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

If you wish to reply, please send your email to <\/strong>memri@memrieurope.org<\/strong>. <\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

11 lutego 2017 r. w wywiadzie dla egipskiego kana\u0142u telewizyjnego CBC prezydent liba\u0144ski Michel 'Aoun usprawiedliwia\u0142 posiadanie broni przez Hezbollah: \u201cJak d\u0142ugo jest ziemia [liba\u0144ska] okupowana przez Izrael i jak d\u0142ugo armia [liba\u0144ska] nie jest wystarczaj\u0105co silna, by walczy\u0107 z Izraelem, uwa\u017camy, \u017ce bro\u0144 [ruchu oporu] jest niezb\u0119dna dla uzupe\u0142nienia broni armii\u201d. Doda\u0142: \u201cBro\u0144 Hezbollahu […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":8389,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[824,835,837,841],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8388","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-specjalne-komunikaty","category-archiwum","category-kraje","category-liban"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www2.memri.org\/polish\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8388","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www2.memri.org\/polish\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www2.memri.org\/polish\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www2.memri.org\/polish\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www2.memri.org\/polish\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8388"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www2.memri.org\/polish\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8388\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8393,"href":"https:\/\/www2.memri.org\/polish\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8388\/revisions\/8393"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www2.memri.org\/polish\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/8389"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www2.memri.org\/polish\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8388"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www2.memri.org\/polish\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8388"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www2.memri.org\/polish\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8388"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}