{"id":11138,"date":"2018-08-07T00:05:22","date_gmt":"2018-08-06T22:05:22","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www2.memri.org\/polish\/?p=11138"},"modified":"2018-08-07T00:05:22","modified_gmt":"2018-08-06T22:05:22","slug":"dzihadysci-publikuja-na-telegram-angielska-ksiazke-aprobujaca-ataki-na-zachod-wzywajaca-tamtejszych-muzulmanow-do-skupiania-sie-na-celach-wojskowych-policyjnych-politycznych-i-ekonomicznych","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www2.memri.org\/polish\/dzihadysci-publikuja-na-telegram-angielska-ksiazke-aprobujaca-ataki-na-zachod-wzywajaca-tamtejszych-muzulmanow-do-skupiania-sie-na-celach-wojskowych-policyjnych-politycznych-i-ekonomicznych\/11138","title":{"rendered":"D\u017cihady\u015bci publikuj\u0105 na Telegram angielsk\u0105 ksi\u0105\u017ck\u0119, aprobuj\u0105c\u0105 ataki na Zach\u00f3d, wzywaj\u0105c\u0105 tamtejszych muzu\u0142man\u00f3w do skupiania si\u0119 na celach wojskowych, policyjnych, politycznych i ekonomicznych"},"content":{"rendered":"

Poni\u017cszy raport jest darmow\u0105 pr\u00f3bk\u0105 MEMRI Jihad and Terrorism Threat Monitor (JTTM). Informacja o prenumeracie JTTM znajduje si\u0119\u00a0<\/em><\/strong>tutaj<\/a><\/u><\/strong>.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

20 lipca 2018 r. kana\u0142 na Telegram pod nazw\u0105 „Media podr\u00f3\u017cy na miesi\u0105c odleg\u0142o\u015bci” opublikowa\u0142 ksi\u0105\u017ck\u0119 zatytu\u0142owan\u0105 D\u017cihad bez granic \u2013 ataki na Zach\u00f3d z islamskiej perspektywy<\/em>, \u00a0w kt\u00f3rej znajduje si\u0119 uzasadnienie d\u017cihadu na Zachodzie i wezwania do muzu\u0142man\u00f3w, szczeg\u00f3lnie tych, kt\u00f3rzy \u017cyj\u0105 na Zachodzie, by dokonywali tych atak\u00f3w. Ksi\u0105\u017cka, oparta na r\u00f3\u017cnych tradycyjnych \u017ar\u00f3d\u0142ach islamskich, przedstawia poj\u0119cie \u201ebezgranicznego d\u017cihadu\u201d jako spraw\u0119 jasn\u0105 i bezdyskusyjn\u0105, a prowadzenie go jako obowi\u0105zek ka\u017cdego muzu\u0142manina. Ksi\u0105\u017cka dostarcza list\u0119 mo\u017cliwych cel\u00f3w takich atak\u00f3w, instruuj\u0105c muzu\u0142man\u00f3w, by skupiali si\u0119 na celach wojskowych, policyjnych, politycznych i ekonomicznych lub na \u201etych, kt\u00f3rzy s\u0105 jawnymi i dobrze znanymi z wrogo\u015bci wobec islamu i muzu\u0142man\u00f3w”. Ksi\u0105\u017cka sugeruje dokonywanie nacelowanych zab\u00f3jstw, ale tak\u017ce masowych metod, szczeg\u00f3lnie \u201ew sytuacjach lub miejscach, w kt\u00f3rych prawdopodobnie nie ma niewinnych, takich jak koszary lub instalacje wojskowe, konferencje polityczne, skrajnie prawicowe demonstracje i zgromadzenia antyislamskie i biura podobne do tego\u00a0[redakcji] \u2018Charlie Hebdo\u2019”.<\/p>\n

Ksi\u0105\u017cka, wed\u0142ug jej wst\u0119pu, ma na celu demistyfikacj\u0119 poj\u0119\u0107 zwi\u0105zanych z d\u017cihadem szczeg\u00f3lnie b\u0142\u0119dnych koncepcji, jakie maj\u0105 muzu\u0142manie \u017cyj\u0105cy na Zachodzie w sprawie natury i zasi\u0119gu d\u017cihadu: \u201eWiele powiedziano o \u2018islamskim terroryzmie\u2019 w \u015bwietle niedawnych atak\u00f3w na Zachodzie w USA, Wielkiej Brytanii, Francji i innych krajach europejskich. Wydaje si\u0119, \u017ce zachodni politycy i komentatorzy osi\u0105gn\u0119li konsensus, \u017ce takie \u2018barbarzy\u0144skie\u2019 ataki nie maj\u0105 nic wsp\u00f3lnego z islamem, by uzasadni\u0107 swoje czyny. Istotnie, wielu muzu\u0142man\u00f3w tak\u017ce powtarza te opinie, stwierdzaj\u0105c jednoznacznie, \u017ce te \u2018czyny i osoby nie maj\u0105 nic wsp\u00f3lnego z islamem\u2019, skutecznie wzmacniaj\u0105c zachodni\u0105 narracj\u0119. Jednak ten dyskurs wydaje si\u0119 ignorowa\u0107 jeden wa\u017cny g\u0142os \u2013 islamu. Zachodnie rz\u0105dy i media przez wiele lat pr\u00f3bowa\u0142y dyktowa\u0107 muzu\u0142manom, czym jest islam lub czym powinien by\u0107 \u2013 wersj\u0105 islamu zgodn\u0105 z zachodnimi idea\u0142ami, zasadami i (globalnymi) interesami. Niestety, wielu muzu\u0142man\u00f3w, szczeg\u00f3lnie na Zachodzie, czuje si\u0119 zdezorientowana tymi sprzecznymi narracjami \u2013 Zachodu i islamu. W rezultacie wielu ma teraz w\u0105tpliwo\u015bci, jaka jest \u2018islamska perspektywa\u2019 na szereg wsp\u00f3\u0142czesnych (i kilka starych) kwestii, przed jakimi stoj\u0105 muzu\u0142manie dwudziestego pierwszego wieku, a jedn\u0105 tak\u0105 kwesti\u0105 jest D\u017cihad\u201d.<\/p>\n

Ta 68-stronicowa ksi\u0105\u017cka w formacie PDF jest napisana czystym brytyjskim angielskim i wydaje si\u0119, \u017ce zosta\u0142a napisana po angielsku, nie za\u015b przet\u0142umaczona z innego j\u0119zyka, takiego jak arabski. Jako autor podany jest Abdullah Ash-Shaybani. Ksi\u0105\u017cka nosi dat\u0119 4 pa\u017adziernika 2017 r. i wed\u0142ug wydawcy, \u201ePublikacje Podr\u00f3\u017cy na Odleg\u0142o\u015b\u0107 Miesi\u0105ca\u201d opiera si\u0119 na rozdziale z innej, jeszcze nieopublikowanej ksi\u0105\u017cki tego samego autora pod tytu\u0142em Ksi\u0105\u017cka Kital: Podstawy D\u017cihadu, jego wsp\u00f3\u0142czesna historia, strategia i taktyki islamskiej wojny oraz zwi\u0105zane z tym orzeczenia<\/em>.<\/p>\n

Og\u0142oszenie o ksi\u0105\u017cce w Telegram brzmi: „W nast\u0119pstwie niedawnych operacji D\u017cihadu przeprowadzonych na Zachodzie, debata dotycz\u0105ca islamskiej perspektywy na takie akcje sta\u0142a si\u0119 g\u0142\u00f3wnym [tematem] dyskursu w kr\u0119gach akademickich i politycznych. Brat Abdullah Ash-Shaybani w swojej pracy D\u017cihad bez granic<\/em> ma na celu wyja\u015bnienie \u00a0islamskiego stanowiska wobec takich czyn\u00f3w przemocy. D\u017bIHAD BEZ GRANIC<\/em> JU\u017b DOST\u0118PNY!!!”<\/p>\n

\"\"
\nThe release of the book on Telegram on July 20, 2018.<\/em><\/p>\n

\"\"
\nOk\u0142adka ksi\u0105\u017cki.<\/em><\/p>\n

Ksi\u0105\u017cka zawiera kilka rozdzia\u0142\u00f3w w\u0142\u0105cznie ze wst\u0119pem i definicj\u0105 \u201dkluczowych termin\u00f3w\u201d, jak r\u00f3wnie\u017c przegl\u0105d poj\u0119\u0107 d\u017cihadu w Koranie i w czasach Mahometa i jego towarzyszy. Du\u017ca cz\u0119\u015b\u0107 ksi\u0105\u017cki zajmuje si\u0119 d\u017cihadem w nowoczesnych czasach, omawia terroryzm jako globalny d\u017cihad \u201ebez granic\u201d; d\u017cihad jako sprawiedliwy i r\u00f3wny odwet\u201d i dostarcza list\u0119 cel\u00f3w do atak\u00f3w na Zachodzie.<\/p>\n

Ci\u0105g dalszy raportu nie jest spolszczony. \u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

\"\"
\nTable of contents.<\/em><\/p>\n

The following are excerpts taken from the book in the original English. While the text was lightly edited for clarity, italicized and bold words below were italicized and bold in the original.<\/p>\n

Excerpts From Chapter Titled „Terrorism: A Global Jihad Without Borders”<\/strong><\/p>\n

„There should be no remaining doubt in the minds of the readers regarding the misconception that seeks to restrict Jihad\u00a0<\/em>to being merely a tool of self-defense, after reviewing the preceding evidence from the Koran, and the actions of the Prophet. And even when it is used in a defensive capacity, its nature is still extremely aggressive and intimidating… Nor is Jihad restricted to particular lands (i.e. the lands of the Muslims) or particular times…<\/p>\n

„Likewise, evidence points towards the obligatory nature of\u00a0Jihad<\/em>, and that the Muslims are permitted, nay, even obliged at times, to pursue the disbelievers in their lands; because of the latter’s disbelief and aggression against Islam and the Muslims… Therefore, in order for the Muslims to fulfil this obligation of\u00a0terrorizing\u00a0<\/em>the disbelievers, they are required to amass and demonstrate military capability, comparable to today’s concept of the\u00a0military deterrent<\/em>…<\/p>\n

„In conjunction, the Muslims may also employ a military policy and tactics, such as those employed by the Messenger of Allah and his companions to achieve the objective of terrorizing Allah’s and their enemies. Tactics such as:<\/p>\n

„\u00b7\u00a0Pre-emptively striking the disbelievers upon the receipt of intelligence suggesting they are preparing to attack the Muslims.<\/p>\n

„\u00b7\u00a0In addition, they constantly reconnoitered and executed ambushes targeting any military column or trade caravan belonging to the Quraysh that they were able to reach.<\/p>\n

„\u00b7\u00a0The Messenger of Allah also prepared and dispatched special operations units which neutralized key figures and incendiary elements from amongst the disbelievers.<\/p>\n

„Tactics that, when, and if, employed today by the Muslims would no doubt be blasted as\u00a0extremism<\/em>, 'not representing Islam,’ and a host of other unsavory interpretations, by an abundance of western commentators, counter-terror and extremism experts, and\u00a0moderates<\/em>…<\/p>\n

„However, the Muslims need not be concerned about such accusations, condemnations, and attacks from those who are neither familiar with Islam, nor are they remotely interested in alleviating the Muslims’ plight. Rather, these critics, from their own mouths, are admittedly open adversaries to the Muslims, and intent on the destruction of Islam…<\/p>\n

„Moreover, the world’s elite Special Forces units, many of which belong to western so-called 'tolerant,’ 'just’ and 'democratic’ nations, without exception, all subscribe to the very same tactics against their enemies (which today, are more often than not, the Muslims). This is clearly evident in the way they expend so much of their time and resources preparing, training for, researching and developing such tactics. As such, the hypocrisy of the one who supports and promotes this behavior from western militaries and intelligence agencies, while condemning in the strongest possible terms the very same actions carried out by Muslims, becomes glaringly apparent. Perhaps it is because the Muslims are 'terrorists’ and non-state actors there is a moral difference. However, people would do well to remember these same western nations were instrumental in the decline, division and eventual abolition of the Islamic Caliphate. Not only that, but they continue work tirelessly to prevent\u00a0every\u00a0<\/strong>project, without exception, working to re-establish any semblance of a potential future Islamic state from achieving this…”<\/p>\n

Excerpts From Chapter Titled „Jihad: Just And Equal Retaliation”<\/strong><\/p>\n

„Consequently, it ought to be declared to the disbelievers in the West, 'even if the Muslims do err in their attacks against you, such as when people that should not have been, and could have been avoided, are harmed, what you and your governments are doing is even worse!’ Muslim men, women, children, and elderly are massacred indiscriminately without respite, such as is currently the case in more than a dozen Muslim countries. However, perhaps even more detrimental than this, many western countries have adopted deliberate and systematic policies designed, such as the UK’s\u00a0Prevent<\/em>,\u00a0<\/em>to strip away the religion of their Muslim inhabitants. Consequently, many of the 'basic liberties and freedoms’ the West prides itself on, are withheld from the Muslims. Freedoms such as, the freedom to practice their religion in the way Allah intended, freedom of thought, freedom of speech, freedom of dress, and more are all curtailed, ironically enough, in the name of freedom, tolerance, and western values…<\/p>\n

„The US, France, Germany, Spain, Portugal, and Russia, all have been guilty of similar exploits, albeit at different times and in slightly different manners. However, one fact remains the same; all of these western nations historically relied heavily on indiscriminate acts of violence and mass terrorism to achieve their political and economic goals. Facts that the Muslims of the Middle East, North Africa, and Caucuses can readily attest to, along with the Japanese of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and the Jews of Nazi Germany. Today is little different, with many of these same nations currently relying on the same tactics to achieve their ambitions…<\/p>\n

„Allah commands the believers to respond to the assaults of the disbelievers in, at least, a like-fashioned manner except if this would involve sin and disobedience to Allah… As such, Muslims are indisputably justified to treat countries such as the US, Britain, France, Russia, Israel, Iran, and China, in exactly the same way as they are currently treating Muslims in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Yemen, Somalia, Mali, the Central African Republic (CAR), Chechnya, East Turkistan, Burma, and others. These Muslim countries are subject to regular assaults consisting of drone strikes, bombing campaigns, and ground incursions, by one or more of these (primarily Western) nations. The vast majority of those targeted and affected by this aggression and oppression are non-combatants, mostly consisting of women, children, elderly, and weak Muslims…”<\/p>\n

Excerpts From Chapter Titled „Establishing A Proactive And Dynamic Islamic Defense Model”<\/strong><\/p>\n

„Furthering the above discussion clarifying the legitimacy of Muslim retaliation, logic and military strategy both, dictate a compelling case for the presently defensive Muslims to seize the initiative, becoming proactive in countering the global war on Islam. Thus, abandoning a passive, and at best, reactionary approach towards the unprecedented aggression against their religion, lives, wealth, and honor, they are currently being subjected to. Such a passive attitude, to date, has resulted in the disbelievers’ frequent assaults against the Muslims, and when the Muslims do resist, the recurring channeling of the\u00a0Mujahidin<\/em>into pockets of severely limited influence. These pockets are then managed and contained by the powerful disbelieving nations, herded in much the same way as a flock of sheep is from pasture to pasture before, at days end, finally being driven to its pen, as can be seen in the current situations in Syria and elsewhere.<\/p>\n

„Regrettably, such behavior on the part of the Muslims is in stark contrast to the example displayed by the Messenger of Allah, who, after being subject to a month-long siege and the severest attack the Muslim had faced until that point, resolved never to allow the Muslims to be put in such a precarious situation again… Another sentiment the Muslims would do well to adopt, in conjunction with the Prophet’s attitude, is the well-known maxim; 'the best form of defense is a good offense’…<\/p>\n

„Consequently, if the disbelievers continue to attack and plunder the wealth and resources of Muslims in their lands, then the Muslims should be expected to respond in, at least, a similar fashion, if not more, as a just and equal recompense to the formers aggression. What is more, even\u00a0if\u00a0<\/em>the disbelievers were not busy assaulting the Muslims and their lands, fighting them would still be justified because of their disbelief in Allah, and as a preventative measure curtailing their ability to spread corruption, transgression, and oppression globally…<\/p>\n

„Therefore, the Muslims have a number of divinely legislated clauses that rationalize them attacking the disbelievers. This is above and beyond their basic right to defend themselves, for in this global conflict their religion and very existence is at stake. Former UK Prime Minister Tony Blair highlighted this fact when he said, 'We are fighting a war, but not just against terrorism but about how the world should govern itself in the early twenty-first century, about global values.’ While another former UK Prime Minister, David Cameron,\u00a0described the conflict as being of an 'existential’ nature. So, if the very heads of the West are openly admitting that, for their civilization to exist and endure, they must fight the Muslims, then why are the Muslims not appreciating the magnitude of the conflict and fighting them with the same resolve?<\/p>\n

„Hence, in responding to this\u00a0existential\u00a0<\/em>threat, it is essential that the Muslims view themselves not at individuals, or tribes, or as citizens of nation states, but as part of the wider Muslim community (Ummah<\/em>) that comprises of every Muslim on earth. Thus, Muslims in the East and West share a faith-based connection superseding all other allegiances and loyalties… This Islamic\u00a0brotherhood\u00a0<\/em>practically translates as the Muslims in the West are struck with same feeling of pain and anguish that the Muslims in the East are experiencing, stirring them to take revenge on their brothers and sisters behalf. This is because they know that the Muslims in the East are powerless to retaliate against US, British, or Russian fighter jets that bomb their lands with impunity. Therefore, the Muslim in the West attacks a military installation, soldiers, or leader of the (offending) disbelievers in solidarity with his or her Muslim brethren, despite hundreds or thousands of kilometers separating them… They also recognize that one soldier beheaded on the streets of London has a greater impact on the global conflict than one thousand soldiers killed in the lands of the Muslims. So, if the Muslims are unable to connect with each other physically, they are able to connect emotionally, spiritually, and conceptually, coordinating their efforts as part of a global\u00a0Jihadi\u00a0<\/em>defensive strategy…”<\/p>\n

Excerpts From Chapter Titled „Practical Implications”<\/strong><\/p>\n

„The preceding evidence from the Koran and the\u00a0Sunnah\u00a0<\/em>of His final Messenger Muhammad, should serve as proof that, far from being prohibited, or\u00a0un-Islamic<\/em>, attacking the disbelievers in their counties is not only firmly sanctioned in Islam, but at times obligatory, according to the capability of the Muslims. Having established this point, a number of questions arise:<\/p>\n

„\u00b7\u00a0Even though such attacks are Islamically permissible,\u00a0should\u00a0<\/strong>the Muslims carry out such attacks?<\/p>\n

„\u00b7\u00a0If Muslims do conduct such attacks;<\/p>\n

„i. How should these operations be carried out, and<\/p>\n

„ii. Who can, and should, be targeted by these operations?<\/p>\n

„In tackling the first question as to\u00a0should\u00a0<\/strong>the Muslims carry out such attacks, the legal status of\u00a0Jihad\u00a0<\/em>must first be classified, according to the agreed upon tenets of Islamic Jurisprudence. According to the consensus of Islamic scholars…\u00a0Jihad\u00a0<\/em>alternates between a collective obligation (which is its default ruling), as in the case of ’Offensive\u00a0<\/em>Jihad<\/em>,’ and an individual obligation, as is the case with ’Defensive Jihad<\/em>’…<\/p>\n

„Accordingly, the only question as to the obligatory nature regarding attacking the disbelievers in their countries, as part of an\u00a0offensive Jihadi\u00a0<\/em>strategy<\/em>, rests on the Muslims ability to prepare and conduct such operations. However, when\u00a0Jihad\u00a0<\/em>becomes defensive in nature, it evolves into an individual obligation as agreed upon by all Islamic scholars… Therefore…\u00a0Jihad\u00a0<\/em>in this era is, without a doubt, an individual obligation on all able-bodied Muslims…<\/p>\n

„At present, conducting operations against the disbelievers in their countries appears to fall clearly within the first and fifth categories. As for the first category, attacking the disbelievers aims at repelling, or deterring their harm. This may well be done, and is currently being done, throughout the battlefields in many Muslim countries. However, perhaps, and Allah knows best, a far more affective and economic method is for Muslims to prevent the disbelieving soldiers, by killing or injuring them, before they have even set off from their countries in order to attack the Muslims, rather than waiting for them to wreak their havoc on the Muslims once they have reached the Muslim’s countries… A contemporary example of this occurred in the 2009 Fort Hood operation conducted by Nidal Hassan, who single-handedly attacked a US army barracks, killing thirteen and wounding more than thirty US soldiers as they prepared to leave for Afghanistan…<\/p>\n

„Attacks, especially in which (western) disbelieving captives are taken, may also be employed to secure the release, or exchange of Muslim prisoners…<\/p>\n

„Therefore, after considering the question from these angles, it seems that attacking the disbelievers in their countries is, in fact, an obligation on the Muslims from both, offensive and defensive perspectives. The only preventative factor barring the Muslims from undertaking such operations is their inability or weakness… Consequently, the first question now ceases to be an enquiry as to\u00a0should\u00a0<\/strong>the Muslims attack the disbelievers in their countries, but rather that the Muslims are\u00a0required<\/strong>, if they have the capability to do so, to perform such attacks and operations…”<\/p>\n

Excerpts From Chapter Titled „Valid Targets”<\/strong><\/p>\n

„Following, the question remains as to 'how these operations should be carried out, and against whom,’ which according to the preceding evidence, appears to be the real debate Muslims should be engaged in regarding the issue of attacks in West. In answering these questions, the first point of reference for the believer, is, as always, the Koran…<\/p>\n

„An analysis of the Messenger of Allah’s\u00a0Jihad\u00a0<\/em>against the disbelievers reveals that he and his companions conducted various types of operations… As such, any operations carried out by the Muslims today should aim to conform to the practices of the Messenger of Allah and his companions in this regard. In addition, all reasonable attempts should be made to adhere to the general advice of the Prophet concerning the intentional killing of women, children, and the elderly. Furthermore, all attempts should be made to avoid physically harming Muslims living alongside the disbelievers in their countries, resulting from such attacks.<\/p>\n

„In addition to the general prohibition on the intentional targeting of women, children, and the elderly, the principle of avoiding otherwise Islamically permissible actions, in order to avert potential harm that would befall the Muslim’s reputation, if such acts were carried out…<\/p>\n

„The same principle may be applied in today’s context wherein the deliberate targeting of women, children, the elderly (non-combatants), and places of worship, by the Muslims will, in many cases, have adverse effects far outweighing the potential gains of such operations. Another group possible to add to the above categories is that of those people not hostile towards Islam or the Muslims. Indeed, some of them, far from displaying hostility, may even be of great benefit and assistance to the Muslims and their causes…<\/p>\n

„Hence, while the Muslims possess both opportunity and ability, their attacks would do well to focus on military, law enforcement, political, and economic targets, or those who are openly and well known for their enmity towards Islam and the Muslims… are all applicable and feasible for the Muslims, especially those already residing in the disbelievers’ countries.<\/p>\n

„As with all\u00a0Jihadi\u00a0<\/em>operations in general, attacks in the disbelievers’ countries should be no exception, to the rule that, when and wherever possible, all\u00a0Jihadi\u00a0<\/em>operations should be utilized in furthering a broader global Islamic\u00a0Jihadi\u00a0<\/em>strategy…<\/p>\n

„With consideration to\u00a0how\u00a0<\/em>these attacks are to be carried out, there are a number of means at the disposal of the Muslims today. Each having its own specific benefits and potential harms, which should be considered, along with a number of additional factors, by the people of knowledge, experience, and insight, prior to any such operation being undertaken.<\/p>\n

„Some of the more discriminate methods include targeted assassinations… these surgically targeted key individuals and criminals from amongst the disbelievers. In general, this form of targeted operation greatly minimizes\u00a0collateral damage\u00a0<\/em>to members of the public and otherwise uninvolved parties. While more indiscriminate methods and techniques may be employed in situations or places in which there are not likely to be\u00a0innocents<\/em>, such as in military barracks or installations, political conferences, far-right anti-Islam demos and gatherings, and at offices similar to that of\u00a0Charlie Hebdo<\/em>, which present far less concern over the issue of collateral damage.<\/p>\n

„Such targets, that exhibit clear and open hostility towards Islam and the Muslims, truthful members of the public, even if they do not agree with such operations on the part of the Muslims, would be hard pressed to argue on behalf of any victims belonging to the aforementioned categories. Thus, justification for the Muslims attacking such targets is clear and apparent, in both, religious texts as well as from a logical perspective, despite any attempts of western media to obscure motives behind such attacks. As opposed to (the majority of) attempts to justify apparently\u00a0random\u00a0<\/em>mass attacks against\u00a0civilians\u00a0<\/em>in the West. As such, whilst there is the opportunity to pursue more lucrative targets, the neutralization of which, it is presumed, would have a greater impact in favor of the Muslims in the contemporary global War against Islam, should be focused on…”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Poni\u017cszy raport jest darmow\u0105 pr\u00f3bk\u0105 MEMRI Jihad and Terrorism Threat Monitor (JTTM). Informacja o prenumeracie JTTM znajduje si\u0119\u00a0tutaj. 20 lipca 2018 r. kana\u0142 na Telegram pod nazw\u0105 „Media podr\u00f3\u017cy na miesi\u0105c odleg\u0142o\u015bci” opublikowa\u0142 ksi\u0105\u017ck\u0119 zatytu\u0142owan\u0105 D\u017cihad bez granic \u2013 ataki na Zach\u00f3d z islamskiej perspektywy, \u00a0w kt\u00f3rej znajduje si\u0119 uzasadnienie d\u017cihadu na Zachodzie i wezwania […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":11142,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[832,836],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11138","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-projekt-badan-nad-dzihadem-i-terroryzmem","category-tematy"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www2.memri.org\/polish\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11138","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www2.memri.org\/polish\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www2.memri.org\/polish\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www2.memri.org\/polish\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www2.memri.org\/polish\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11138"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www2.memri.org\/polish\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11138\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11145,"href":"https:\/\/www2.memri.org\/polish\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11138\/revisions\/11145"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www2.memri.org\/polish\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/11142"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www2.memri.org\/polish\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11138"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www2.memri.org\/polish\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11138"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www2.memri.org\/polish\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11138"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}